Mike Lindell was accosted by a woman saying she was serving him legal papers while he was being interviewed at the Conservative Political Action Conference — a chaotic on-camera moment that saw the MyPillow founder and conservative commentator try to dodge the delivery before tossing the documents aside.
The unnamed woman interrupted Lindell while he was being interviewed at the gathering in Grapevine, Texas — bursting on camera and telling him, “You’ve been served.”
Lindell initially resisted, saying, “We’re on TV, please” and “I’m not accepting it,” as the camera rolled.
Interviewer Michael Casey of the O’Keefe Media Group, who posted the clip on X on Thursday, repeatedly asked the woman the reason for serving the papers.
Lindell eventually took them out of her hands — only to hurl them behind him seconds later.
“Deranged leftist interrupts my interview with @realMikeLindell trying to ‘serve’ him court papers,” Casey captioned the video. “Mike Lindell’s reaction was priceless.”
Details about the documents were not immediately known. The Post has sought comment from Lindell.
It wasn’t clear whether the papers were connected to Lindell’s ongoing legal battles, which include multiple defamation cases stemming from his claims about the 2020 presidential election.
The confrontation appeared to add to a growing list of courtroom headaches for Lindell.
Lindell’s courtroom troubles have piled up in recent years, driven largely by his repeated claims about the 2020 election and the legal fallout that followed.
The MyPillow founder, a vocal supporter of President Trump, claimed the 2020 election was stolen.
In a Colorado defamation case brought by former Dominion Voting Systems employee Eric Coomer, a jury found Lindell liable and awarded millions in damages last year.
A federal judge recently denied Lindell’s attempt to overturn the verdict and ordered his legal team to explain why they shouldn’t face additional sanctions — the latest in a string of rebukes over flawed court filings and citation errors.
Elsewhere, Lindell remains entangled in high-stakes defamation litigation brought by voting technology firms including Smartmatic, with a judge ruling that key elements of defamation have already been established.
