NEWYou can now listen to articles!
Lake Tahoe could become more expensive for visitors as the U.S. Forest Service considers new and higher recreation fees at several popular sites around the basin.
The Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit is proposing fee changes at campgrounds, beaches, trailheads and other recreation areas, according to a U.S. Department of Agriculture news release.
Under the proposal, some locations that are currently free to visitors would begin charging fees.
TRAVELERS MAY BE SLAPPED WITH ‘RIDICULOUS’ NEW FEES AS POPULAR CITY SEEKS MILLIONS PER YEAR
Kiva Beach and the Taylor Creek Visitor Center, for example, would begin charging $10 per vehicle before eventually increasing that to $15, the proposal indicates.
Other locations that already charge visitors could also get more expensive.
Visitors to Lake Tahoe (pictured) could face new or higher fees at several recreation sites under a proposal being considered by the U.S. Forest Service. (iStock)
The fee at Eagle Falls Picnic Area and Trailhead would increase from $5 per vehicle to $10 before eventually reaching $15.
Campers could also see new costs.
Luther Pass Overflow Campground and Watson Lake Campground, which are currently free, would each begin charging $20 per site.
Money collected would go toward operating, maintaining and improving recreation sites.
More than 37% of recreation sites would remain free if the changes are approved — while nationally recognized fee-free days would continue, according to the release.
Money collected from the fees would go toward operating, maintaining and improving recreation sites.
CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR LIFESTYLE NEWSLETTER
Under federal law, the Forest Service can keep at least 80% of the fees collected at the sites for local use.
“Revenue collected through recreation fees would help the forest improve infrastructure and public services at recreation sites during the season of operation,” the USDA said in the release.
Kiva Beach, shown above, would begin charging $10 per vehicle, with fees eventually rising to $15 under the proposal. (iStock)
The public can comment on details of the proposal through Sept. 29.
After the comment period ends, a citizens advisory committee will review the proposal and make a recommendation to the regional forester, who will make the final decision, according to the press release.
CLICK HERE FOR MORE LIFESTYLE STORIES
The proposal has drawn pushback online, with some people raising concerns about having to pay for places they regularly visit.
“Sign me up for the riot if they make Kiva pay to park,” one Reddit user wrote.
If approved, the changes would still leave more than 37% of recreation sites free to visit, while nationally recognized fee-free days would remain in place. (iStock)
Another commenter suggested giving local residents a free seasonal parking pass.
“I have no problem paying to recreate in other areas I visit,” the user wrote. “But my city of residence? Give me back my tax money, then.”
TEST YOURSELF WITH OUR LATEST LIFESTYLE QUIZ
Another commenter similarly argued that “season passes and fees should only be for non-locals,” adding, “I’m happy to pay when I visit other towns.”
Not everyone opposed charging fees altogether.
One commenter said that doing so during the busy summer months could make sense, but questioned charging visitors year-round.
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE APP
“I can see doing it in the summer because of the amount of visitors,” the user wrote. “But doing it year-round feels excessive.”
Digital reached out to the U.S. Forest Service for comment.
