Democrats’ sweeping midterm victory, and particularly their coming control of the US Senate, strengthen the Federal Reserve against President Trump’s efforts to meddle with it, with the Senate’s control over appointments a major guardrail against Trump landing any more allies at the central bank.
It could also mean new headaches for Chairman Kevin Warsh, with key oversight committees now in the hands of Democrats, and in the case of the Senate Banking Committee, with Democratic Sen. Elizabeth Warren, of Massachusetts, a harsh Warsh critic, likely replacing Trump ally and Warsh supporter Tim Scott of South Carolina as the panel’s chair.
Warsh “got no support for his chairmanship from Democrats … Hostile questioning could put Warsh’s rhetoric to the test,” as he pursues a quieter and less publicly transparent form of central banking, economists from Monetary Policy Analytics, the firm of former Fed Governor Larry Meyer, wrote about the fallout of a Democratic Senate win.
Democrats, having campaigned heavily on cost-of-living issues, have incentive to push Warsh on the central bank’s inflation mandate, while the panel will have broad room to investigate issues they regard as important — such as, in Warren’s case, Warsh’s opaque disposition of hundreds of millions of dollars in assets as he ascended to the Fed’s top job.
For Trump, the new dynamics on Capitol Hill directly stymie his effort to put more allies on the Fed’s seven-member board, three of whom were appointed by former President Joe Biden. Former Chair Jerome Powell, appointed to consecutive terms by Trump and Biden but now at odds with the president, remains on the board as well.
The president has called the configuration “hostile” and “partisan,” and argued the Fed needs to drastically cut interest rates that policymakers — including Warsh — have instead been raising to control high inflation.
Trump’s effort to fire Governor Lisa Cook remains ongoing, with a White House administrative procedure expected in coming weeks to set the stage for a Trump announcement that he has “cause” to fire her over errors on mortgage applications that predate her appointment to the Fed.
A court challenge is likely to follow. The Supreme Court has ruled against Trump once already on the effort to oust Cook, and there’s next to no prospect he would get a chosen replacement confirmed by a Democrat-led Senate if he were ultimately successful in removing her.
Even a Republican-controlled body rejected what were seen as extreme Fed appointments during Trump’s first term, and earlier this year Republican Sen. Thom Tillis, who decided not to run for reelection in North Carolina after Trump threatened him in a race won by Democrat Roy Cooper on Tuesday, held up Warsh’s nomination until the administration abandoned a criminal investigation of Powell.
More coverage of the 2026 midterm elections:
A Senate under Democratic control “would change the confirmation environment for future Trump nominees…and could provide the Fed with a different degree of political support,” Mark Spindel, a partner at Pilot Wave Holdings and author of a book about Fed politics, wrote in an analysis of the election’s implications.
Fed independence “has always depended in part on Congress, and institutional support from the Senate can affect how much room policymakers have to make decisions based on inflation and employment rather than political pressures.”
Democratic control of the Senate committee as well as the House Financial Services Committee could also entangle the bank and regulatory reforms pushed by the administration and by current Fed Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman, with the Fed drafting rules over things like the Genius Act regulating stablecoins, and Bowman recently rolling out a consolidation of the Fed’s bank supervision system.
