Columbia University administrators considered caving to the demands of anti-Israel students — including financial divestment from companies with ties to the Jewish state and disciplinary amnesty for demonstrators occupying campus — and ended up suspending just four undergraduate protesters, according to a new House Republican committee report.
The House Education and Workforce Committee in a 122-page report released Thursday revealed the “astounding concessions” and other failures by Columbia, Harvard, Yale, MIT, Northwestern, Rutgers and UCLA officials that led to an explosion of on-campus anti-semitism over the past year.
“For over a year, the American people have watched antisemitic mobs rule over so-called elite universities, but what was happening behind the scenes is arguably worse,” said Education Committee Chairwoman Virginia Foxx in a statement.
“While Jewish students displayed incredible courage and a refusal to cave to the harassment, university administrators, faculty, and staff were cowards who fully capitulated to the mob and failed the students they were supposed to serve,” Foxx (R-NC) noted.
Hundreds of anti-Israel students pitched a tent encampment on Columbia’s South Lawn on April 17 and immediately entered into negotiations with university administrators about the conditions under which they would end their protest.
The administrators quickly cooked up a “menu” of responses to the demands, according to emails, documents and interviews conducted by the House committee.
They first offered for Columbia’s Advisory Committee on Socially Responsible Investing (ACSRI) to review the demonstrators’ divestment plans from Israel-linked firms and defense manufacturers supplying weapons to the US and its allies.
They also proposed a new student exchange program with Al-Quds University in the West Bank, an institution that has hosted pro-Hamas rallies and at least one demonstration in which the participants waved banners of suicide bombers and made Nazi salutes.
They further pitched amnesty for all students on interim suspension after setting up the Gaza Solidarity Encampment and a path toward reinstating the suspended student groups leading it: Students for Justice in Palestine and Jewish Voice for Peace.
The two groups were banned from campus after hosting events the month after Hamas’ Oct. 7 massacre that promoted “threatening rhetoric and intimidation” against Jewish students.
That hostile environment for Jews continued at the encampment, where students glorified Hamas terrorists as “martyrs” and at least one of its leaders declared: “Zionists don’t deserve to live.”
Talks between them and administrators broke down on April 29, even as Columbia President Minouche Shafik praised the “important ideas that emerged from this dialogue.”
“We plan to explore pursuing them in the future,” promised Shafik, who resigned from her post in August.
The NYPD cleared Columbia’s anti-Israel encampment and stormed into occupied Hamilton Hall on the night of April 30, arresting 112 people. At least 80 were students, and 32 were not affiliated with the school.
While the university pledged to expel 22 of the Hamilton Hall occupiers, only three were suspended and one was put on disciplinary probation. The rest graduated or remain in good standing.
Columbia University Apartheid Divest member Khymani James, who told administrators they should “be grateful that I’m not just going out and murdering Zionists,” was suspended last spring — but he and the group have stood by the hateful rhetoric.
In total, Columbia suspended just four students in anti-semitism disciplinary proceedings, put 41 on some kind of probation, warned another four about their conduct and had “mandatory educational conversations as part of an alternative resolution process” with 15 students, according to the committee’s report.
The Republican-led House Education panel faulted the school’s administrators for “appeasing” the demonstrators, which emboldened other students to set up similar tent encampments at Rutgers and Brown University.
“By rewarding egregious conduct violations with staggering concessions rather than enforcing university rules, these agreements set dangerous precedents that invite future chaos and could open colleges and universities up to potential violations of Title VI,” the report states, referencing the federal law preventing discrimination based on shared ancestry.
The committee’s report also found that Harvard University administrators made “an intentional decision” to water down their statement that failed to condemn Hamas’ attack.
“We denounce this act of terror,” reads an earlier draft of the statement. The sentence was jettisoned.
Then-Harvard Law School Dean John Manning, who has since become the school’s provost, successfully lobbied against more language that referenced the hundreds of hostages taken by Hamas.
“The violence hits all too close to home for many at Harvard,” the earlier draft states. “Some members of our community have lost family members and friends; some have been unable to reach loved ones, and others fear that their loved ones may have been taken hostage.”
The administrators also opted against denouncing a joint statement from 31 Harvard student groups holding Israel “entirely responsible” for Hamas’ atrocities.
“This may be slicing things too fine. But I also wonder whether, if the judgment is not to express an institutional condemnation of Hamas’s act of terror, there might still be a way to dissociate the university from the ‘Israel is entirely responsible’ statement reportedly issued by 31 Harvard student groups – and attracting widespread media attention (not to mention denunciation by Rep. [Elise] Stefanik),” wrote Secretary of the University Marc Goodheart in an Oct. 9, 2023, email.
Harvard President Claudine Gay and several deans lobbied hardest for the final statement that expressed a moral equivalency between Hamas’ terror act and Israel’s declaration of war against the jihadists in Gaza.
Harvard Corporation senior fellow Penny Pritzker in an Aug. 29 transcribed interview with the comittee called the statement “massively inappropriate at the time and insufficient.”
Pritzker had also pushed Gay to acknowledge that student signs declaring “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free” or any of its variants were “clearly” anti-semitic, pointing out that alumni were wondering “why we would tolerate that and not signage calling for Lynchings by the KKK.”
The president dodged the inquiry and handed it off to then-Provost Alan Garber, who responded in an Oct. 22, 2023, email that the “genocidal implication when used by Hamas supporters seem clear enough to me” but “that’s not the same as saying there is a consensus that the phrase itself is always antisemitic.”
Gay in another email the same day admitted that her concern in labeling the phrase anti-semitic “prompts the question of what we’re doing about it, i.e. discipline.”
Two months later, Stefanik (R-NY) grilled Gay over the distinction.
“Does calling for the genocide of Jews violate Harvard’s rules of bullying and harassment? Yes or no?” the House Republican conference chairwoman asked in a Dec. 5 House Education and Workforce Committee hearing.
“It can be depending on the context,” Gay replied — a remark that was widely denounced and she later recanted.
“It does not depend on the context — the answer is yes, and this is why you should resign,” Stefanik fired back.
The House Education panel’s report found that Gay later privately mocked Stefanik as a “supporter” of the far-right Proud Boys who stormed the US Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.
Meeting minutes from a Board of Overseers sit-down show Gay said what she “should have expressed is that calls for violence against jeweish [sic] community shouldn’t be allowed.”
But the president also disparaged Stefanik as a “purveyor of hate” and “supporter of proudboys.”
“Our investigation has shown that these ‘leaders’ bear the responsibility for the chaos likely violating Title VI and threatening public safety,” Foxx said.
“It is time for the executive branch to enforce the laws and ensure colleges and universities restore order and guarantee that all students have a safe learning environment.”
Reps for Columbia and Harvard Universities did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
